🛡️ Encryption Excellence Through Systematic Implementation
🎯 Demonstrating Cryptographic Expertise for Security Consulting
📋 Document Owner: CEO | 📄 Version: 1.2 | 📅 Last Updated: 2026-01-25 (UTC)
🔄 Review Cycle: Annual | ⏰ Next Review: 2027-01-25
Hack23 AB's cryptographic implementation demonstrates how systematic encryption practices directly enable both security excellence and business innovation. Our cryptography policy serves as both operational framework and client demonstration of our cybersecurity consulting expertise.
As a cybersecurity consulting company, our approach to cryptography becomes a showcase of professional cryptographic standards, demonstrating to potential clients how proper encryption implementations enable business security without hindering functionality.
Our commitment to transparency means our cryptographic practices become a reference implementation, showing how systematic encryption approaches create competitive advantages through robust security foundations.
— James Pether Sörling, CEO/Founder
This policy establishes cryptographic standards and procedures for Hack23 AB, ensuring appropriate encryption of data at rest, in transit, and in processing across all systems and applications.
Scope: All systems in Asset Register, data per Data Classification Policy, and supplier services per SUPPLIER.md.
Organizations implementing this policy MUST:
flowchart TD
subgraph "🔐 Encryption at Rest Requirements"
EXTREME[Extreme Data<br/>✅ MUST: HSM Encryption]
HIGH[High Data<br/>✅ MUST: AES-256 CMK]
STANDARD[Standard Data<br/>✅ MUST: AES-256 Service]
end
subgraph "🔑 Key Management Requirements"
KMS[Key Management Service<br/>✅ MUST: Centralized KMS]
ROTATION[Key Rotation<br/>✅ MUST: Annual minimum]
BACKUP[Key Backup<br/>✅ MUST: Cross-region]
end
subgraph "📋 Compliance Gates"
AUDIT[Audit Logging<br/>✅ MUST: All key operations]
ACCESS[Access Control<br/>✅ MUST: Least privilege]
MONITORING[Monitoring<br/>✅ MUST: Real-time alerts]
end
EXTREME --> KMS
HIGH --> KMS
STANDARD --> KMS
KMS --> AUDIT
ROTATION --> ACCESS
BACKUP --> MONITORING
style EXTREME fill:#D32F2F
style HIGH fill:#FFC107
style STANDARD fill:#4CAF50
Encryption at Rest Requirements:
- ✅ MUST implement AES-256 encryption for all data storage systems
- ✅ MUST use centralized key management service (AWS KMS or equivalent)
- ✅ MUST enforce customer-managed keys (CMK) for high-classification data
- ✅ MUST implement automated key rotation (annual minimum, quarterly preferred)
Data transmission security implementation MUST:
graph LR
subgraph "🌐 Transport Layer Requirements"
TLS13[TLS 1.3 Preferred<br/>✅ MUST: Modern protocols]
TLS12[TLS 1.2 Minimum<br/>✅ MUST: Legacy support]
CIPHERS[Strong Ciphers<br/>✅ MUST: AEAD suites only]
end
subgraph "🔒 Protocol Implementation"
HTTPS[HTTPS Everywhere<br/>✅ MUST: All web traffic]
API[API Security<br/>✅ MUST: TLS + signatures]
EMAIL[Email Encryption<br/>✅ MUST: TLS + S/MIME]
end
subgraph "📊 Validation Requirements"
TESTING[Protocol Testing<br/>✅ MUST: Automated validation]
GRADING[Security Grading<br/>✅ MUST: SSL Labs A+]
MONITORING[Traffic Monitoring<br/>✅ MUST: Weak cipher detection]
end
TLS13 --> HTTPS
TLS12 --> API
CIPHERS --> EMAIL
HTTPS --> TESTING
API --> GRADING
EMAIL --> MONITORING
style TLS13 fill:#4CAF50
style HTTPS fill:#1565C0
style TESTING fill:#FFC107
Transport Security Requirements:
- ✅ MUST implement TLS 1.3 for all new implementations
- ✅ MUST support TLS 1.2 minimum for legacy compatibility
- ✅ MUST use only modern cipher suites with forward secrecy
- ✅ MUST achieve SSL Labs A+ rating for all public endpoints
Cryptographic key management MUST:
sequenceDiagram
participant GEN as 🔑 Key Generation
participant STORE as 🏦 Secure Storage
participant USE as 🔐 Key Usage
participant ROTATE as 🔄 Key Rotation
participant DELETE as 🗑️ Secure Deletion
GEN->>STORE: ✅ MUST: HSM generation
STORE->>USE: ✅ MUST: Least privilege access
USE->>ROTATE: ✅ MUST: Annual rotation
ROTATE->>DELETE: ✅ MUST: Secure key destruction
DELETE->>GEN: ✅ MUST: Audit trail maintained
Key Management Requirements:
- ✅ MUST generate all cryptographic keys using hardware security modules
- ✅ MUST implement centralized key management with AWS KMS or equivalent
- ✅ MUST enforce role-based access control for all key operations
- ✅ MUST maintain complete audit trails for key lifecycle events
| Algorithm Type | Algorithm | Key Size | Implementation | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🔐 Symmetric | AES | 256-bit | ||
| 🔑 Asymmetric | RSA | 4096-bit | ||
| 🔑 Asymmetric | Ed25519 | 256-bit | ||
| 🔍 Hashing | SHA-256 | 256-bit | ||
| 🔍 Hashing | SHA-3 | 256-bit |
| Deprecated Algorithm | Security Issue | Replacement | Deadline |
|---|---|---|---|
| MD5 | SHA-256 | ||
| SHA-1 | SHA-256 | ||
| DES/3DES | AES-256 | ||
| RC4 | AES-GCM |
Implementation follows Data Classification Policy requirements:
flowchart TB
subgraph "🌐 Public Internet"
USERS[Users/Clients<br/>TLS 1.3 Preferred]
CDN[CloudFront CDN<br/>TLS Termination]
WAF[AWS WAF<br/>Cipher Suite Filtering]
end
subgraph "🔒 Application Layer"
ALB[Application Load Balancer<br/>TLS 1.2+ Only]
API[API Gateway<br/>Modern Ciphers]
LAMBDA[Lambda Functions<br/>HTTPS Everywhere]
end
subgraph "💾 Data Layer"
RDS[RDS PostgreSQL<br/>Force SSL]
S3[S3 Buckets<br/>HTTPS Required]
KMS[KMS Operations<br/>TLS 1.3]
end
USERS --> CDN
CDN --> WAF
WAF --> ALB
ALB --> API
API --> LAMBDA
LAMBDA --> RDS
LAMBDA --> S3
LAMBDA --> KMS
style USERS fill:#1565C0
style CDN fill:#4CAF50
style ALB fill:#FF9800
style RDS fill:#7B1FA2
Comprehensive key management per Asset Register AWS services:
Domain certificate management aligned with Network Security Policy:
| Domain | Certificate Type | Issuer | Security Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| hack23.com | |||
| blacktrigram.com |
Approved cipher suites for TLS 1.3:
TLS_1_3_Ciphers:
- TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 # ✅ AEAD with perfect forward secrecy
- TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 # ✅ AEAD optimized for mobile
- TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 # ✅ AEAD acceptable for performance
TLS_1_2_Ciphers:
- ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 # ✅ Forward secrecy + AEAD
- ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 # ✅ Forward secrecy + AEAD
- ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 # ✅ Forward secrecy + AEAD
Prohibited_Ciphers:
- All non-AEAD ciphers # ❌ No authentication
- RC4 family # ❌ Stream cipher weakness
- DES/3DES family # ❌ Inadequate key strengthflowchart LR
ASSESS[🔍 Crypto Assessment] --> IMPLEMENT[🔒 Algorithm Updates]
IMPLEMENT --> VALIDATE[✅ Security Validation]
VALIDATE --> MONITOR[📊 Performance Monitoring]
MONITOR --> ASSESS
ASSESS --> THREAT[🚨 Threat Intelligence]
THREAT --> QUANTUM[🔮 Post-Quantum Prep]
QUANTUM --> IMPLEMENT
style ASSESS fill:#1565C0
style IMPLEMENT fill:#4CAF50
style VALIDATE fill:#FF9800
style MONITOR fill:#7B1FA2
Business Value Demonstration:
All code commits and releases MUST be cryptographically signed:
GPG Key Management:
- ✅ Primary signing key: 4096-bit RSA with 2-year expiration
- ✅ Subkeys for signing operations (rotate annually)
- ✅ Private keys protected with strong passphrase (see Password Policy below)
- ✅ Public keys published to GitHub, keyservers, and Maven Central
- ✅ Key backup stored in encrypted offline storage
SSH key requirements for infrastructure access:
| Use Case | Algorithm | Key Size | Passphrase | Rotation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub Access | Ed25519 | 256-bit | ✅ Required | Annual |
| AWS EC2 Access | Ed25519 | 256-bit | ✅ Required | Annual |
| Server Administration | Ed25519 | 256-bit | ✅ Required | Annual |
| Legacy Systems | RSA | 4096-bit min | ✅ Required | Annual |
SSH Hardening Requirements:
- ✅ MUST disable password authentication on all servers
- ✅ MUST use Ed25519 for new key generation (RSA-4096 for legacy only)
- ✅ MUST protect private keys with strong passphrase
- ✅ MUST use SSH agent with timeout (12 hours maximum)
- ✅ MUST maintain authorized_keys audit trail
- ❌ MUST NOT share SSH keys between systems or personnel
Cryptographic Password Requirements:
| Password Type | Minimum Length | Complexity | Rotation | Storage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Master Passwords | 20+ characters | High entropy passphrase | Annual | Hardware token + memory |
| Service Accounts | 32+ characters | Random generation | 90 days | AWS Secrets Manager |
| API Keys | 40+ characters | Cryptographic random | 90 days | AWS Secrets Manager |
| Database Credentials | 32+ characters | Random generation | 90 days | AWS Secrets Manager |
| Encryption Passphrases | 25+ characters | High entropy | Annual | Hardware token |
Secrets Management Architecture:
flowchart TB
subgraph "🔐 Secrets Storage"
SM[AWS Secrets Manager<br/>Primary secrets store]
KMS[AWS KMS<br/>Secrets encryption]
PARAM[SSM Parameter Store<br/>Configuration secrets]
end
subgraph "🔑 Key Hierarchy"
MASTER[Master CMK<br/>Secrets Manager CMK]
APP[Application Keys<br/>Per-service secrets]
ROTATE[Automatic Rotation<br/>Lambda-based]
end
subgraph "📋 Audit & Compliance"
TRAIL[CloudTrail<br/>Access logging]
ALERT[CloudWatch Alerts<br/>Anomaly detection]
REVIEW[Quarterly Review<br/>Access audit]
end
SM --> KMS
PARAM --> KMS
KMS --> MASTER
MASTER --> APP
APP --> ROTATE
SM --> TRAIL
TRAIL --> ALERT
ALERT --> REVIEW
style SM fill:#FF9800
style KMS fill:#4CAF50
style MASTER fill:#1565C0
Prohibited Practices:
- ❌ NEVER store secrets in source code, environment files, or documentation
- ❌ NEVER transmit secrets via unencrypted channels (email, chat, tickets)
- ❌ NEVER reuse passwords across different systems
- ❌ NEVER use predictable or dictionary-based passwords
Key Compromise Response Procedures:
| Incident Type | Severity | Response Time | Immediate Actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private Key Exposure | Critical | <1 hour | Revoke key, rotate affected systems, notify stakeholders |
| Password/Secret Leak | High | <4 hours | Rotate secret, audit access logs, assess exposure scope |
| Weak Algorithm Detection | Medium | <24 hours | Plan migration, assess risk, implement stronger algorithm |
| Certificate Expiry | Medium | <24 hours | Renew certificate, validate deployment, test connectivity |
| HSM/KMS Issue | Critical | <1 hour | Activate backup keys, engage AWS support, incident documentation |
Incident Response Steps:
- Detection & Triage - Identify scope and severity of cryptographic incident
- Containment - Revoke compromised keys/certificates immediately
- Eradication - Remove exposure source, rotate all potentially affected secrets
- Recovery - Deploy new cryptographic material, validate system functionality
- Post-Incident - Document lessons learned, update procedures, enhance monitoring
Notification Requirements:
- Internal: CEO notified within 1 hour for Critical/High severity
- External: Per Incident Response Plan requirements
- Regulatory: GDPR 72-hour notification if personal data potentially affected
NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (Finalized 2024):
Transition Timeline:
- 2025-2026: Inventory cryptographic assets, monitor AWS/cloud provider PQC support
- 2027-2028: Hybrid implementations (classical + PQC) for high-value assets
- 2030+: Full PQC migration per NIST/NSA guidance
Current Actions:
- ✅ Cryptographic asset inventory maintained in Asset Register
- ✅ Monitoring AWS KMS PQC roadmap
- ✅ Algorithm agility designed into key management architecture
- 🔄 Awaiting cloud provider hybrid TLS support
- 🎯 Information Security Strategy - Strategic cryptography direction, post-quantum roadmap, and AI-first operations
- 🔐 Information Security Policy - Overall security governance framework and AI-First Operations Governance
- 🏷️ Classification Framework - Encryption level requirements by data classification
- 🏷️ Data Classification Policy - Data handling and protection requirements
- 🌐 Network Security Policy - Network encryption and TLS standards
- 🔑 Access Control Policy - Key management and authentication controls
- 🤖 AI Policy - AI agent cryptographic requirements
- 💻 Asset Register - Cryptographic asset inventory
- 🛠️ Secure Development Policy - Application encryption requirements
- 🤝 Third Party Management - Supplier cryptographic assessments
📋 Document Control:
✅ Approved by: James Pether Sörling, CEO
📤 Distribution: Public
🏷️ Classification:
📅 Effective Date: 2026-01-25
⏰ Next Review: 2027-01-25
🎯 Framework Compliance: