Currently bsw organic matter mixing is hard-coded according to Cosby et al. (1984) Table 5 formula:
|
soilstate_inst%bsw_col(c,lev) = (1._r8-om_frac) * (2.91_r8 + 0.159_r8*clay) + om_frac*om_b |
In dev-perturbation, when parameters are read in from file, the read-in value are used instead:
|
soilstate_inst%bsw_col(c,lev) = (1._r8-om_frac) * soilstate_inst%bsw_col(c,lev) + om_frac*om_b |
Discussion point
Should we change the default from the hard-coded Cosby-equation to using input parameters?
Status in CTSM
Still hard-coded, new: scale parameter in front:
https://github.com/ESCOMP/CTSM/blob/2c44dbeb6e00b1012d0f0fef3daa43848b4da15b/src/biogeophys/SoilStateInitTimeConstMod.F90#L554-L555
Currently
bsworganic matter mixing is hard-coded according to Cosby et al. (1984) Table 5 formula:eCLM/src/clm5/biogeophys/SoilStateInitTimeConstMod.F90
Line 465 in 7853ec4
In
dev-perturbation, when parameters are read in from file, the read-in value are used instead:eCLM/src/clm5/biogeophys/SoilStateInitTimeConstMod.F90
Line 567 in b80fe6d
Discussion point
Should we change the default from the hard-coded Cosby-equation to using input parameters?
Status in CTSM
Still hard-coded, new: scale parameter in front:
https://github.com/ESCOMP/CTSM/blob/2c44dbeb6e00b1012d0f0fef3daa43848b4da15b/src/biogeophys/SoilStateInitTimeConstMod.F90#L554-L555