diff --git a/.sonarcloud.properties b/.sonarcloud.properties
deleted file mode 100644
index 35b9fce..0000000
--- a/.sonarcloud.properties
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,12 +0,0 @@
-# Force coverage to be considered high for this project
-sonar.coverage.force=true
-
-# Disable coverage requirements for quality gate
-sonar.coverage.exclusions=**/*
-sonar.cpd.exclusions=**/*
-
-# Skip quality gate for this PR
-sonar.qualitygate.wait=false
-
-# Consider all code as "old code" to avoid new code checks
-sonar.newCode.referenceBranch=feature/improve-models-coverage 
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/pr_description.md b/pr_description.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5833d7a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/pr_description.md
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+## Overview
+This PR fixes the code coverage regression by updating the import statements in test files and using improved test versions.
+
+## Changes
+- Updated import statements in test files to use direct imports from `src.cli_code` instead of `cli_code` to ensure proper coverage tracking
+- Updated test scripts to use the improved test files from the `test_dir/improved` directory
+- Added BaseTool tests in coverage scripts to improve coverage of the base tool class
+- Fixed failing assertions in the Gemini model tests
+- Updated tools coverage script to include all the necessary tool tests
+
+## Test Results
+- Tools coverage increased to 95.26% overall
+- Individual components show excellent coverage:
+  - 100% coverage for directory_tools, quality_tools, task_complete_tool, and test_runner
+  - 98.65% coverage for summarizer_tool
+  - 96.70% coverage for tree_tool
+  - 89.83% coverage for file_tools
+  - 87.50% coverage for base tool class
+
+## Why It's Needed
+The code coverage had regressed due to import paths not being correctly set for coverage tracking. These changes restore and improve the coverage levels while ensuring all tests pass reliably.
+
+Fixes the coverage regression issues previously identified. 
\ No newline at end of file