Paper writing sprint tasks

[wanjauk]

These are tasks to be undertaken during the open science hack paper sprint.

Abstract

• Add abstract

Introduction
The introduction will be composed of a review of the status of open science in the country based on the literature search of the section below.

• Add introduction.

Status of Open Science in Kenya: Literature search
In this section, and the introduction, we will conduct a review of the status of open science in the country. The following are points that comprise the message of this section:

• What kind of resources are available to support open science
• Are there policies or incentives for open science practices?
• What kind of training activities have been conducted to promote and train students and researchers on open science tools and practices?

Data Mining
This section has tasks that access the publishing trends of Kenyan authors.

• What is the publishing trend by Kenyan researchers? Are they publishing open access, and how has this changed over the years?
• The adoption of pre-prints by Kenyan researchers. Who drives the adoption of pre-prints among Kenyan authors?
• Collaboration trends among Kenyan authors based on pre-prints data and already published research (from mining PubMed literature).
• Open data and Code. Are Kenyan authors making the data and code available and accessible, and are they adhering to the FAIR principles?

Low-Cost Open Access publishing
In this section, we explore some of the avenues to publishing open access at low cost, especially for students who want to publish open-access with little funding.

• What are the options for publishing open access at low cost?
• Are there available waivers and subsidies for authors in developing countries (low income and lower middle income countries).
• Are there some funding opportunities he can tap into for support?

Discussion
What do the results mean? How does your results fit to the current literature? How do they compare to other similar studies?

• Add discussion

Conclusion
What is the take-home message from this article? What are the recommendations?

• The need for a framework to guide the adoption of open science practices. Take note of the barriers and provide recommendations.

• The need for low-cost publishing

• The need for policies on open science that can be implemented by various institutions. For example, we can provide a template that can be adopted by most institutions

• Add conclusion

[kipkurui]

Thanks @wanjauk See my update to the Google Docs outline and harmonize accordingly.

[wanjauk]

Thanks @wanjauk See my update to the Google Docs outline and harmonize accordingly.

I have updated the tasks accordingly. Please let me know if further adjustments are required. Thanks.