feat: add HTTP request smuggling skill

Add strix/skills/vulnerabilities/http_request_smuggling.md covering CL.TE, TE.CL, H2.CL, H2.TE desync techniques, detection methodology, exploitation scenarios, and validation steps.

Cherry-picked from usestrix#405.

Author: Ahmex000

strix/skills/vulnerabilities/http_request_smuggling.md

@@ -0,0 +1,255 @@
+---
+name: http-request-smuggling
+description: HTTP request smuggling testing covering CL.TE, TE.CL, H2.CL, H2.TE, and HTTP/2 desync techniques with practical detection and exploitation methodology
+---
+
+# HTTP Request Smuggling
+
+HTTP request smuggling (HRS) exploits disagreements between a front-end proxy and a back-end server about where one HTTP request ends and the next begins. When the two systems parse `Content-Length` and `Transfer-Encoding` headers differently, an attacker can prefix a hidden request to the back-end's socket, which is then prepended to the next legitimate user's request. The impact ranges from bypassing front-end security controls to full cross-user session hijacking.
+
+## Attack Surface
+
+**Infrastructure Topologies**
+- CDN or load balancer in front of origin server (Cloudflare, Nginx, HAProxy, AWS ALB)
+- Reverse proxy chains (Nginx → Gunicorn, HAProxy → Node.js, Varnish → Apache)
+- API gateways forwarding to microservices
+- HTTP/2 front-end to HTTP/1.1 back-end translation (H2.CL / H2.TE)
+- Tunneling servers or WAFs that terminate and re-forward requests
+
+**HTTP Versions in Play**
+- HTTP/1.1: CL.TE and TE.CL classic smuggling
+- HTTP/2: H2.CL (downgrade injects Content-Length) and H2.TE (injects Transfer-Encoding)
+- HTTP/3: emerging QUIC-based desync (less common, research-stage)
+
+**Parser Differentials**
+- Treatment of duplicate `Content-Length` headers
+- Handling of `Transfer-Encoding: chunked` when `Content-Length` is also present
+- Chunk size obfuscation via whitespace, tab, case, or invalid extensions
+
+## High-Value Targets
+
+- Front-end security controls (authentication bypass via desync)
+- Endpoints shared by many users (high-traffic APIs, chat, feeds)
+- Request capture endpoints (search, logging, analytics)
+- Session-sensitive endpoints (auth callbacks, account settings)
+- Internal admin interfaces proxied through the same connection pool
+
+## Core Concepts
+
+### CL.TE — Front-end uses Content-Length, Back-end uses Transfer-Encoding
+
+Front-end reads `Content-Length: X` bytes and forwards. Back-end reads until the `0\r\n\r\n` chunk terminator. Attacker appends a hidden request after the `0` terminator that the front-end considers part of the same body but the back-end treats as a new request.
+
+```http
+POST / HTTP/1.1
+Host: target.com
+Content-Length: 6
+Transfer-Encoding: chunked
+
+0
+
+G
+```
+The `G` is left in the back-end's socket buffer and prepended to the next request.
+
+### TE.CL — Front-end uses Transfer-Encoding, Back-end uses Content-Length
+
+Front-end reads chunked body to completion. Back-end reads only `Content-Length` bytes, leaving the remainder on the socket.
+
+```http
+POST / HTTP/1.1
+Host: target.com
+Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
+Content-Length: 3
+Transfer-Encoding: chunked
+
+8
+SMUGGLED
+0
+
+
+```
+
+### H2.CL — HTTP/2 Front-end Downgrades to HTTP/1.1, Injects Content-Length
+
+HTTP/2 has no `Content-Length` vs `TE` ambiguity in its own framing. But when the front-end downgrades to HTTP/1.1 for the back-end, an attacker can inject a `Content-Length` header in the HTTP/2 request pseudo-headers that conflicts with the actual body length:
+```
+:method POST
+:path /
+:authority target.com
+content-type application/x-www-form-urlencoded
+content-length: 0
+
+SMUGGLED_PREFIX
+```
+
+### H2.TE — HTTP/2 Injects Transfer-Encoding Header
+
+Inject `transfer-encoding: chunked` in HTTP/2 headers (which the HTTP/2 spec forbids, but some front-ends pass through). Back-end receives both headers, may prefer TE over CL.
+
+```
+:method POST
+:path /
+transfer-encoding: chunked
+
+0
+
+SMUGGLED
+```
+
+## Key Vulnerabilities
+
+### Front-End Security Control Bypass
+
+A front-end proxy enforces authentication or IP restriction by checking request headers and blocking or allowing based on rules. If a smuggled prefix bypasses the front-end (because it's buried in a prior request's body from the front-end's view), the back-end processes it without the security check.
+
+**PoC structure (CL.TE):**
+```http
+POST /not-restricted HTTP/1.1
+Host: target.com
+Content-Length: 116
+Transfer-Encoding: chunked
+
+0
+
+GET /admin HTTP/1.1
+Host: target.com
+X-Forwarded-Host: target.com
+Content-Length: 10
+
+x=1
+```
+The `GET /admin` is seen by the back-end as a new, legitimate request originating from the trusted proxy IP.
+
+### Cross-User Request Capture
+
+Poison the back-end socket with a partial request prefix that captures the next victim user's request (including their cookies, tokens, request body) into the response of a controlled endpoint (search, comment submission).
+
+**PoC structure (CL.TE capture):**
+```http
+POST /search HTTP/1.1
+Host: target.com
+Content-Length: 129
+Transfer-Encoding: chunked
+
+0
+
+POST /search HTTP/1.1
+Host: target.com
+Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
+Content-Length: 100
+
+q=
+```
+`Content-Length: 100` in the smuggled prefix is longer than the actual smuggled body, so the back-end waits for 100 bytes — which it sources from the *next* user's request. The `/search` endpoint reflects the query, capturing headers and body of the subsequent request.
+
+### Response Queue Poisoning
+
+On pipelined connections, cause a misaligned response to be delivered to the wrong user (HTTP/1.1 response queue poisoning). Used to deliver attacker-controlled content or steal another user's response.
+
+### Request Reflection / Cache Poisoning Chain
+
+Smuggle a prefix that hits a cacheable endpoint with an injected `Host` header. If the cache stores the response keyed only on URL, the poisoned response is served to all users requesting that URL.
+
+### WebSocket Handshake Hijacking
+
+If the proxy performs WebSocket upgrade, a smuggled `Upgrade` request can hijack an existing WebSocket connection from a subsequent user.
+
+## Detection Techniques
+
+### Timing-Based Detection
+
+**CL.TE:** Send a request where `Content-Length` is complete but `Transfer-Encoding` body is missing the `0\r\n\r\n` terminator. A CL.TE-vulnerable back-end waits for the terminator, causing a timeout.
+
+```http
+POST / HTTP/1.1
+Host: target.com
+Transfer-Encoding: chunked
+Content-Length: 6
+
+3
+abc
+X
+```
+If response is delayed 10–30 seconds, CL.TE desync likely.
+
+**TE.CL:** Send a request with `Transfer-Encoding` present but `Content-Length` set to fewer bytes than the chunk content. TE.CL back-end waits for more bytes per Content-Length.
+
+### Differential Response Detection
+
+Send two requests in sequence. If the second request receives an unexpected response (error, redirect, wrong content), the first may have poisoned the socket. Use a unique string in the smuggled prefix to confirm.
+
+### Content-Length + Transfer-Encoding Combination
+
+```http
+Transfer-Encoding: xchunked        # non-standard value, some FE ignore, BE accept
+Transfer-Encoding:\x20chunked      # leading space
+Transfer-Encoding: chunked         # tab before value
+Transfer-Encoding: x
+Transfer-Encoding: chunked         # duplicate TE headers, BE uses last
+```
+
+## Transfer-Encoding Obfuscation
+
+To force TE disagreement:
+```
+Transfer-Encoding: xchunked
+Transfer-Encoding : chunked       # space before colon
+X: X\r\nTransfer-Encoding: chunked # header injection into existing header value
+Transfer-Encoding: chunked\r\nTransfer-Encoding: x  # TE twice
+```
+
+## HTTP/2-Specific Detection
+
+- Send HTTP/2 requests with injected `content-length` pseudo-headers that differ from the actual body length
+- Inject `transfer-encoding: chunked` in HTTP/2 headers (spec-forbidden but sometimes passed through)
+- Use HTTP/2 header injection: inject newlines in header values if the front-end passes them to HTTP/1.1 back-end unescaped
+- Observe whether the HTTP/2 connection ID corresponds to a persistent HTTP/1.1 connection to the back-end (connection reuse amplifies impact)
+
+## Testing Methodology
+
+1. **Map the proxy chain** — identify front-end (CDN, load balancer, WAF) and back-end (app server)
+2. **Probe CL.TE** — send a timing probe with mismatched chunked terminator; observe delay
+3. **Probe TE.CL** — send a timing probe with Content-Length shorter than chunked content
+4. **Obfuscate TE header** — try each obfuscation variant (tab, extra space, duplicate, non-standard value)
+5. **Confirm with differential response** — send two rapid identical requests; if second gets an unexpected response, socket is poisoned
+6. **Attempt bypass exploit** — craft a smuggled `GET /admin` or restricted endpoint and observe if back-end accepts it
+7. **Attempt capture** — poison with a partial POST pointing to a reflective endpoint; wait for a follow-up request to fill the buffer
+8. **Test H2.CL/H2.TE** — repeat the same probes over HTTP/2 connections if the target supports HTTP/2
+
+## Validation
+
+1. Show a timing differential of 10+ seconds on the CL.TE or TE.CL probe and explain the mechanism
+2. Demonstrate a bypass: smuggle a request to `/admin` and receive a 200 response where a direct request returns 403
+3. For capture: show a subsequent user's `Cookie` or `Authorization` header appearing in the response of a controlled endpoint
+4. Confirm with a unique marker string in the smuggled prefix to rule out timing noise
+5. Provide the exact raw bytes of the smuggled request
+
+## False Positives
+
+- General network latency or server-side processing delays unrelated to smuggling
+- Server consistently close connection after first request (no connection reuse, no socket sharing)
+- HTTP/2 with full end-to-end HTTP/2 to back-end (no HTTP/1.1 downgrade, no desync surface)
+- WAF or proxy that normalizes TE/CL headers before forwarding (removes the ambiguity)
+
+## Impact
+
+- Authentication and authorization bypass by smuggling requests past front-end access controls
+- Cross-user session hijacking by capturing requests containing session tokens
+- Cache poisoning affecting all users of a cached resource
+- Internal service access bypassing IP-based restrictions enforced at the front-end
+- XSS delivery via response queue poisoning in shared connection contexts
+
+## Pro Tips
+
+1. Use Burp Suite's HTTP Request Smuggler extension as a rapid scanner, but always confirm manually — false positives are common
+2. TE obfuscation is the most reliable path; `Transfer-Encoding: xchunked` works on many Apache/IIS back-ends
+3. Keep smuggled prefixes short during detection; use the minimal body to confirm desync before attempting capture attacks
+4. H2.CL is the most impactful modern variant — many CDNs translate HTTP/2 to HTTP/1.1 and inject `Content-Length` from the `:content-length` pseudo-header
+5. In capture attacks, set `Content-Length` in the smuggled prefix larger than your partial body by 50–100 bytes to catch a full auth header from the next user
+6. Test during low-traffic periods first to avoid affecting real users; always get explicit authorization for capture attempts
+7. If timing probes are inconsistent, pipeline two requests over the same connection and look for unexpected response swapping
+
+## Summary
+
+HTTP request smuggling is eliminated by enforcing consistent TE/CL interpretation at every hop in the proxy chain, preferring end-to-end HTTP/2, and having back-end servers reject or normalize ambiguous requests. At the proxy level, never forward TE headers that were not present in the original request, and treat conflicting CL + TE as a hard error.